Leading Museums, Museum Leaders

“What is to be Auckland’s War Memorial?”

David Gaimster, “What is to be Auckland’s War Memorial?”: the competition for the design of the Auckland War Memorial Museum 1922, Auckland War Memorial Museum, 16 September 2022

On 19 September 1922 a jury of citizens announced the result of the international competition to design the new Auckland War Memorial Museum on the Domain, overlooking the Waitemata harbour. The Museum has a rich archive of original architectural designs, specifications, photographs and press cuttings relating to the international competition which is explored in the video and topic page below by Auckland Museum’s Tumu Whakarae Chief Executive Dr David Gaimster.

“Those who are acquainted with the working of the Museum are aware that it has arrived at a stage in its history when the growth of its collections has altogether overtaken the existing accommodation. The present buildings have served their purpose, and are now totally unfitted for any scheme of development worthy of the name. In addition, they are unworthy of a city of the size and importance of Auckland… one conclusion remains:- to erect a new Museum for Auckland, planned on such a scale, and equipped in such a manner, that it may adequately serve for the recreation, instruction and intellectual advancement of the people of Auckland.” – T.F. Cheeseman, ‘What is to be Auckland’s War Memorial?’, For and on behalf of the Auckland Institute and Museum, 31 May 1919.

Princes Street Museum, Auckland Museum premises from 1876 to 1929, photographed by Burton Brothers. Auckland War Memorial Museum Tāmaki Paenga Hira. No known copyright restrictions.

Following its foundation in 1852 in a local farmhouse and rapid development in purpose-built accommodation and with multiple extensions from the 1870s, by the early 20th century it was apparent that the collections of the Auckland Museum had once again far outgrown the space available to them. Its first professional curator, Thomas Cheeseman, lobbied to construct a building for a museum that could take its place amongst the “chief museums in Australasia”, and by 1920 it was resolved that the erection of a new combined museum and war memorial would be the most appropriate means of commemorating those who had given their lives in the Great War.

Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum, Glasgow, Scotland. Wikimedia Commons, photographed by Herbert Frank. CC BY 2.0.

Writing in 1917, curator T.F. Cheeseman noted the heavy investment being made in the museums and galleries in cities around the world. He made a point of citing the development of Glasgow’s Kelvingrove Museum, opened in 1901 with the profits of the city’s 1888 exhibition. With its flamboyant and eclectic mix of architectural styles emblematic of imperial and of civic pride, its object was to display to visitors the geology, zoology, civilisations and great artistic achievements of humankind. As such, it was divided into departments: art upstairs, the natural world and artefacts, including ethnography, downstairs.  “There can be no doubt that Glasgow has shown greater appreciation of the value of Museums, both by the civic authorities and the citizens generally, than almost any other British city” enthused Cheeseman. In October 1920 Cheeseman identified the National Museum in Washington DC, opened in 1910 (now the National Museum of Natural History), as one of the best designed new museums in the world: “Its internal plan is remarkably well arranged, and the needs of each branch of the collections have been carefully studied… every advantage has been taken of modern modes of construction, and modern ideas as to the planning of Museums.”

Auckland City Council granted the site of Observatory Hill on the Auckland Domain as the site for the new museum: for a building  “to be planned on an impressive and dignified scale, that will consist of a Museum and war Collection, and will be treated in such a manner as to keep permanently alive the purpose and aim of its existence as a memorial of the Great War” with “a ‘Hall of Memory’, in which will be emblazoned the meritorious deeds of many heroes.”1 The Mayor of Auckland, J.H. Gunson, as President of the Auckland Institute and Museum, negotiated a £25,000 subsidy from the Prime Minister on the basis that the sum would be matched by public subscription.

This foundation gift caused much consternation in Wellington, as the Dominion and Star newspapers reported. There it was felt that the Dominion Museum should be privileged for state funding over the needs of the ‘provincial ‘museums and the Auckland grant triggered an intense campaign of lobbying for more funds for the Dominion Museum. The government grant was swiftly followed by a donation of £25,000 from the Auckland Savings Bank and £2,000 from the Auckland Racing Club. The campaign for public funds had begun.

Pamphlet by Cheeseman to raise the funds for the War Memorial building. Auckland Museum MUS-1997-20-1-6. No known copyright restrictions.

The Council of the Auckland Institute and Museum worked with the city’s Engineer’s department to develop “tentative plans, by which it is estimated a building to satisfy the requirements of the museum and to serve as an inspiring memorial of the war will cost not less than £130,000.” 2 Public meetings of citizens were called throughout September and October 1920 to discuss the ‘ways and means’ to raise the balance of funds required, resulting in the appointment on 22 October 1920 of a Citizens’ Committee to promote and organise a public appeal.

Given the scale and importance of the project, Auckland citizens lobbied in the press for a public architectural competition. There was little confidence in the city’s Engineer’s Department having the experience or flair to design the new museum. A “CITIZEN” wrote to the Editor to demand: “a museum building of dignity and beauty, worthy of this city and the treasures to be stored within its walls” and that “a public competition should be invited for designs, so that choice may be made of the best, and no consideration of petty economising in cost of designs should deter us from having use of the best talent available” 3.

A cartoon lampooned the idea that the new museum would be designed by committee, and not via a competitive architectural commission. 4 As the correspondent CIVIC PRIDE put it to the Auckland Star on 12 September 1920: “Are we in Auckland to have such a folly or a monument, ideal and worthy, reflecting the best that is in us, a tribute to ‘Our Glorious Dead?”.

Suggested Design for Memorial, by our Infant Prodigy. Auckland Star, 18 September 1920. Stuff Ltd CC BY-NC-SA 3.0

To loud applause at a public meeting on 22 October 1920, the Mayor and Chairman of the Citizens’ War Memorial Committee, Mr J.H. Gunson, pledged that competitive designs would be called. By mid 1921 the public appeal had raised a total of £120,000, boosted by further gifts of £4,000 each from the NZ Insurance Company and the South British Insurance Company and £1,000 from the Bank of New Zealand. By this stage, the fund target was now £200,000. In July 1921, Mr Gunson observed that the style and quality of the museum memorial building would depend on the success of the public appeal for funds: “Whether the building should be plain concrete, or a more ornate and dignified design faced with stone, depended entirely on the response of the public to the appeal for funds.” 5

The notice for the architectural competition and its schedule of requirements was published in June 1921. Its preamble noted the:

“double object of providing a noble and dignified building suitable for the WAR MEMORIAL of the City and Provincial District of Auckland, and which will also form a worthy repository for the Collections of the Auckland Museum, including its unrivalled Maori Treasures”.

“The building is to allow for extensions harmonising with the building, now projected, so as to ultimately utilise the whole site, not more than one half of which is to be occupied by the building now designed.”

“The style of the proposed building is left to the discretion of the competitors, but there must be no departure from the schedule in the matter of accommodation, and strict regard must be paid to securing the best results from the most modern treatment of the lighting and ventilation of the building, which are matters of vital importance…”

Last updated on: 22 Jul 2022 | File Size: 23 MB

Conditions for Competitive Designs for Auckland War Memorial and Museum Building. Auckland Institute and Museum MUS-1997-20-1-2. No known copyright restrictions.

The competition would be judged by a panel of five nominated by the NZ Institute of Architects and the joint committee of Council and Citizens. The Institute of British Architects in London committed to assist the competition with a grant of £1,000. As a consequence, competition winners would receive a prize of £650; whilst the second and third placed designs would be awarded £250 and £100 respectively.

Some 400 editions of the Conditions for Competitive Designs (1921) were distributed around the Empire. Key desired features of the Schedule of Requirements for the new Museum were included.

In addition to the need for displaying collections commemorating the Great War, Thomas Cheeseman confirmed the second purpose “will be effected by a general museum which the valuable treasures possessed by the present Auckland Museum will be more fully and adequately displayed and room provided for their proper expansion.” He argued:

“Auckland had in its Museum an unequalled series of exhibits illustrating the manners, customs and mode of life of the Maori race. … The collection was in good order and condition, but, from want of space it was not exhibited in a manner worthy of its great value and importance. Nor was it being exhibited in a manner worthy of the dignity and position of the largest city in the dominion. One of the chief reasons for moving the Museum’s collections to a new and much larger building was to provide a fitting home for the Maori treasures, a home in which they would command the attention, not only of the citizens of Auckland, but also of visitors from all parts of the world, and which would be large enough to permit the full development of a general Maori collection” 6.

Historian and ethnographer of the Pacific, Peter H. Buck, also known as Te Rangi Hīroa, commented that “the prospect of adequately housing the Maori collection in Auckland Memorial Museum should give great satisfaction to students of the Maori people and to the Auckland public” 7.

In August 1922 The Auckland Star confirmed that 74 competitive designs for the Auckland War Memorial Museum would be considered by the jury appointed by the joint committee of citizens and members of the Auckland Institute, 25 of which were expected by special dispatch from London. It also reported that the committee would meet shortly to secure a suitable hall for the display of the competitive design to “facilitate the work of the jury of awards”.

The 74 design entries from around the world, including Great Britain, the United States, Canada, Australia and India, were displayed anonymously in Harbour Board Shed No.16 in time for the jury to begin its work on 11 September 1922. The exhibition remained open to the public for several weeks following the jury decision, with an admission charge of 1 shilling. After nine arduous days of judging, on the 19 September, the competition jury wrote to the Mayor of Auckland, Mr J.H Gunson, to confirm results of its deliberations and the placing of the winning designs. The jury acknowledged that:

“a building containing the accommodation demanded by the conditions could not possibly be erected for the amount stated in those Conditions [for Competitive Designs]”. It could not, therefore “reject any design upon the grounds that the cost of erecting the building shown therein would exceed the stated sum.”8

Auckland War Memorial and Museum Competition drawing. Grierson, Aimer & Draffin, MUS-2009-20-1-1. No known copyright restrictions.

It considered that the “only proper and only possible course in these circumstances was to give first place to those designs which gave the required accommodation disposed in the most economical manner, having due regard to the prime requirements in the Conditions that the building should be a ‘noble and dignified’ one and ‘suitable for a war memorial’, and that it should function properly as a museum”.

Hugh Grierson, Keith Draffin and Kenneth Aimer, winning architects of the War Memorial Competition. Auckland War Memorial Museum Tāmaki Paenga Hira. No known copyright restrictions.

The winning entry of the international competition for the design of the proposed War Memorial Museum was won by a local Auckland architectural practice of Grierson, Aimer and Draffin. The Press reported that “the building described by the authors is handsome to a magnificent degree, and sufficiently imposing and dignified to make it impossible for even the casual observer to fail in appreciation of the purpose which it will represent – the perpetuation of the memory of those men and women from the Auckland district who died in the late war.” 9

The newspapers celebrated the fact that the architects had all served in the Great War, seeing action either at Gallipoli or the Western Front. Making optimal use of the commanding position overlooking the Waitemata harbour, the Auckland’s new Parthenon would be distinguished by tall Doric columns supporting an attic panel quoting Pericles: “The whole earth is the sepulcher of famous men. They are commemorated not only by columns and inscriptions in their own country, but in foreign lands also, and by memorials graven not on stone but on the hearts of men” 10

The new temple of the muses was designed in homage to the vision forged through the experiences of New Zealand servicemen who had first seen this Aegean architecture on the decks of warships and who had served at Gallipoli, their very own Trojan War.

Competition drawing: Auckland War Memorial and Museum showing elevations of present and future scheme. Grierson, Aimer & Draffin, MUS-2009-20-1-6. No known copyright restrictions.

Read/view more

Council of Australasian Museum Directors c/o Lynley Crosswell, Museums Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne VIC 3001, © CAMD 2023
Disclaimer: The content of this website is provided for information purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for professional advice. No claim is made as to the accuracy or authenticity of the content of the website. The Council of Australasian Museum Directors does not accept any liability to any person for the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) which is provided on this website. The information on our website is provided on the basis that all persons accessing the site undertake responsibility for assessing the relevance and accuracy of its content. No responsibility is taken for any information or services which may appear on any linked web sites. Hostgator.