Leading Museums, Museum Leaders

New Copyright reviews

Australian Digital Alliance, New Gov IP Reviews, and ALRC redux, Keeping up with Copyright, ADA Newsletter, September 2015

whole_ip_42_4

Inquiry into Copyright and the Digital Economy

The government is thinking very hard about the recommendations of the Australian Law Reform Commission’s (ALRC) Inquiry into Copyright and the Digital Economy. [See CAMD submission to the Inquiry here]. So hard, in fact, that they need two separate reviews to do it. As many of you probably remember, the ALRC’s 2014 report recommended a number of changes to Australia’s copyright law, most significantly (and controversially) the introduction of a US-style fair use provision. This would significantly broaden your ability to make use of material under Australia’s Act without the copyright owner’s permission, and was generally welcomed by user advocates but criticised by rightholders. The government is supposed to respond to the Report by 17 September.

Interestingly, over the last few weeks the government has announced not one but two overlapping reviews that will consider the ALRC recommendations from an economic perspective. The first, commissioned by the Attorney General’s Department and undertaken by Ernst & Young, is a cost benefit analysis that will consider the economic impact of the fair use recommendation and other recommendations from the report. In a similar vein, following a recommendation from the Competition Policy (Harper) Review earlier in the year, the Treasurer has asked the Productivity Commission to undertake a 12 month public inquiry into Australia’s intellectual property system and to have reference to the ALRC recommendations in its considerations (among other materials). The PC Inquiry is much broader than that being undertaken by AGD, and is tasked with ensuring that the intellectual property system “provides appropriate incentives for innovation, investment and the production of creative works while ensuring it does not unreasonably impede further innovation, competition, investment and access to goods and services.”

The ADA is cautiously optimistic that based on their references both inquiries are likely to look favourably on the ALRC’s recommendations. We will be working with both AGD and the PC to try to ensure this outcome.

Council of Australasian Museum Directors, c/o Ms Daryl Karp, Museum of Australian Democracy at Old Parliament House PO Box 3934 Manuka, Australian Capital Territory 2603 Australia, © CAMD 2021
Disclaimer: The content of this website is provided for information purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for professional advice. No claim is made as to the accuracy or authenticity of the content of the website. The Council of Australasian Museum Directors does not accept any liability to any person for the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) which is provided on this website. The information on our website is provided on the basis that all persons accessing the site undertake responsibility for assessing the relevance and accuracy of its content. No responsibility is taken for any information or services which may appear on any linked web sites. Hostgator.
.