Leading Museums, Museum Leaders

Te Papa Head of Writing Frith Williamson

Frith Williams, Head of Writing at Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

How To Create Compelling Museum Experiences: Frith Williams On Accessibility, Innovation, And Storytelling, Museum Hack, March 2017

Museums are places where we learn about our past and imagine our future possibilities.  Yet many museums struggle with finding ways to not only connect to visitors, but to inspire them.

At Museum Hack, we know that storytelling is a key to overcoming this challenge.  There are many ways that museums can tell better stories – and not just during tours.

We recently spoke with Frith Williams, Head of Writing at the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.  She spends her days focused on how to create innovative narrative experiences that inspire audiences to love and learn from museums.  Frith shared with us why writing and storytelling are vital to museums, and gave us some unique insights into how museums in New Zealand compare to those in the United States.

MH: Tell us a bit about your position as Head of Writing.

Frith:  Sure. I head a team of eight motley but enormously talented writers – poets, theatre and TV writers, short-story writers, an ex-radio producer, a digi specialist, and people who’ve worked in educational publishing. It’s amazing to have that spread of skills – it means we can cover lots of styles. Today, all their emails to each other were haikus.

We’re part of Te Papa’s wider interpretive crew, which includes subject experts, designers, multimedia producers, educators, and public-programme specialists. We work with this team to craft the storylines for different experiences, set the text approach, and write the content. Our focus is on exhibitions, but increasingly that means scripting for multimedia experiences.

We’re always looking for the ‘way in’ for the audience – what’s going to grab them, and move them, and leave them wanting more. The intriguing, surprising, unexpected, unseen. The most important question we ask: ‘Why should I care?’ You can’t ask that too many times – I know you Museum Hackers feel the same.

MH: Exactly!  That’s our central tenet to all the experiences we craft.  What is the benefit of having a team dedicated to writing?

Frith: I think having a professional writing team makes a huge difference to how visitor-friendly and successful Te Papa is. It’s really a recognition that creating content for exhibitions – for three-dimensional space, where visitors are on their feet and easily distracted – requires special skills, as does working in multiple media, and across disciplines, and for a really broad audiences.  Our collections span history, the natural environment, and art, and bringing all that into a cohesive, powerful experience can be challenging. Normally, we work from briefs from our experts, but in art, often from curators’ drafts. Whatever the process, it really helps that our content creation is centralised, so the same standards apply across the board.

The decision to use professional writers goes back to when the National Museum and National Art Gallery merged in 1998, forming what we are today. Te Papa’s goal was to be a really different sort of museum – a really community-oriented, accessible, creative museum, and one with a strong narrative focus.

MH: Do you feel Te Papa has become that?  What advice do you have for institutions seeking to become community-oriented, accessible, and known for creativity and engagement?

Frith: I think we’ve done incredibly well, but that doesn’t mean we can’t improve. We’re the most visited museum in Australasia – visitation was 2.3 million last year if we include touring shows. That’s not bad for a country of just 4.5 million people! We get great satisfaction ratings and just had our highest numbers of visitors aged 16–24 since opening – those ever-elusive millennials.

But our cultural reach doesn’t yet match the demographics of our community, so we know we need to work on making Te Papa even more of a community hub. We also want to get more creative with our exhibition development processes, involve our visitors and communities more as active participants – not just passive receivers of knowledge – and bring in other creative partners. Those final few points count as advice too!

MH: Speaking of success, what was your most successful exhibit ever – and why do you think it was so successful?

Frith: That’s easy – Gallipoli: The Scale of Our War, which explores a failed WWI campaign that still holds real significance for New Zealanders. And talking of creative collaborations, that show was a partnership with Weta Workshop (of Lord of the Ringsfame). It’s just hit 700,000 visitors in one year, so definitely our most successful exhibition ever.

Sir Richard Taylor was the Creative Director, and he really pushed us. Everything we did was aimed at taking visitors on an emotional journey and honouring the soldiers’ stories – huge life-like models of eight New Zealanders who were there, an immersive design and soundtrack, and their voice, because we wrote in the first person – from the soldiers’ perspective – not in a conventional curatorial voice. It’s given us the confidence to experiment much more in the future.

MH: Last year, you traveled to the United States to explore museums.  What was your experience like?  (What do U.S. museums do that differs from New Zealand?  What insights did you gain?)

Frith:  The trip was absolutely amazing – just having that time to think and talk and explore. Everyone who works in the sector knows how hard it is to get that when you have endless deadlines to meet. I really have to thank Fulbright NZ for giving me the opportunity, and Te Papa for letting me go. But it was also really intense. Totally non-stop.

What’s different about US museums? Three obvious things. The amount of money available and the private funding model. The gobsmacking diversity of the sector. And the pretty big gap between tradition and innovation. I think that’s what struck me most. I encountered lots of really exciting, bold work, particularly in the digital realm and within education teams, but it was harder to find museums that were really accessible and innovative throughout, perhaps because, on the whole, the interpretive decision-making rests with subject experts, especially in art museums.

I think we need to explore more collaborative content-creation processes, and take a holistic view of the visitor experience, if we really want to attract more visitors.

MH: What was the most memorable experience during your trip?

Frith: Well, I loved being based at the Cooper Hewitt Smithsonian Design Museum with Seb Chan, Micah Walters, Pam Horn, and their wider team. They’ve been doing some great stuff. And I loved talking with so many interesting museum-ers around the country – everyone was so generous with their time and knowledge.

When it comes to memorable museum experiences, I have a few favourite spots alongside Cooper Hewitt: Noah’s Ark at the Skirball, Connected Worlds at New York Hall of Science, the immersive multimedia experiences at Minnesota History Museum, Peabody Essex Museum’s cross-disciplinary work, Museum of Jurassic Technology, City Museum in St Louis, American Visionary Art Museum, Corning Museum of Glass … actually, I could go on and on!

I did a lot of thinking about memorability. What struck me was that I hardly remembered a word I read. The really powerful experiences were the physical, social, or creative ones, which matches research into what makes content memorable. The immersive WWII D-Day experience at Minnesota History Museum stands out. And detour.com is doing some great audio storytelling in different communities. Oh, and of course my Museum Hack tour!

Read more

Council of Australasian Museum Directors, c/o Ms Daryl Karp, Museum of Australian Democracy at Old Parliament House PO Box 3934 Manuka, Australian Capital Territory 2603 Australia, © CAMD 2020
Disclaimer: The content of this website is provided for information purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for professional advice. No claim is made as to the accuracy or authenticity of the content of the website. The Council of Australasian Museum Directors does not accept any liability to any person for the information or advice (or the use of such information or advice) which is provided on this website. The information on our website is provided on the basis that all persons accessing the site undertake responsibility for assessing the relevance and accuracy of its content. No responsibility is taken for any information or services which may appear on any linked web sites. Hostgator.
.